|
|
|
| IN TOUCH |
| WITH AUTISTIC SERVICES.INC. |
PREVIOUS ISSUE / |
 |
|
Picture
a person who walks into a room, picks up a brush and seemingly begins
to mix and match random abstract shapes and colors onto a canvas. When
this person is finished, you’re not quite sure what you’re looking at,
but you’re convinced that what you just witnessed was the result of a
very carefully planned out action by the artist. If you weren’t reading
this in an autism newsletter you’d probably think that we’re
referring to Jackson Pollock. We’re not. We’re not referring to any one
particular member of our arts program either. Instead we’re referring to an entire population. As we see it, the
autism spectrum puts a new face on the meaning of art. How fortunate we
are to have a small segment of that population in our classrooms! For
us, an arts program that orbits around the autism spectrum seems like
an inevitable match. As you know, the function of seeing is part of the
spectrum disorder that constitutes autism. So a person with autism is
receiving visual stimuli in a way that the rest of us are not. In
short, they see things differently. There are literally dozens of books
that use the title “The Art of Seeing,” a phrase that implies that
seeing is not solely mechanical. Once the mind enters the equation,
seeing becomes subjective. It becomes an art. So why isn’t everyone
asking the question: “what is the person with autism seeing? “
Autism
can be viewed as part of art’s full existence. It’s as if art has been
waiting all these millennia for autism to appear, so that it could
finally find a new spectrum of expression. This union can be compared
to the instinctive relationship that human beings have with language.
Human kind has been communicating for millions of years. It took a more
evolved mind to employ the deeper layers of meaning that language has
to offer. Eventually poets emerged to give language the romance it
longed for. For centuries, art has been romanticized by geniuses with
“big brains.” But now we have a new roster of geniuses, with even
“bigger brains,” who are here to offer a new subtext to art. Like all
art, we can dismiss it, if we want to. Or we can spend time being
pulled into the sub-conscious. This time of year
is special to ASI because we hold an annual exhibition of art done by
our participants. It is a two-sided goal for us. On one side, we expand
our population’s ability to reach out to the community. On the other
side is the community that we’re reaching out to. We hope that your
community joins us in October and November to support our population,
help us celebrate The Art of Seeing, and The Art of Autism.
|
|
 |
| |


We
didn’t write that headline. “Guys in Ties and Ties on Guys” belongs to
Stacey. In her own words, it’s one of the things that is guaranteed to
grab her eye. So much so that she’s composed a portrait series of
famous “guys in ties.” Her recent appearance of Fred Flintstone was an
unexpected but clever addition to her series. Until now, we never
really noticed that Fred sported a blue tie. Another example of how art
invites us to see what they see. Look for Stacey at our two
approaching Arts Work exhibitions. And if you’re a guy... be sure to
have on a tie.

|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
| |
There’s
a term used in the arts community for work that is created by those who
lack a formal training in art technique; the term is “outsider art.”
The term itself was coined by art critic Roger Cardinal, and was meant
to describe what he viewed as “rough art.” Today the term has been
re-defined for artists who were never formally recognized or had their
creativity informed by academic conventions. In a way, these “outsider
artists” exemplify art in its purest form. It is the imagination in its
purest form. I hesitate to refer to the work by
our population as “outsider art” for what should be obvious reasons.
However, the principles of this term wonderfully apply to the art of
our individuals: They are true demonstrations of where the mind goes
when the imagination is liberated. In western culture, we’ve built a
reverent mystique around art and the artist. Some of the artists in our
population could care less about having the “artist” moniker attached
to their names. They have removed the formality that is often attached
to “insider art” and reduced it to its most pure and simplistic
compound: Imagination. In the words of Neil Sanders, artist and ASI participant, “The only
thing I can tell you about Autism is that it is a mystery.” The
imaginative art of this population, so far, is our most telling clue
about this mystery. I invite you to enjoy the artwork, the imagination,
and the mystery of this whole experience. I am grateful to these
individuals for allowing us to become “insiders.”
|
|
|
|
|
| for Future Issues |
|
|